Whereas the data on which the Analytics are based is in frequently public domain sporting results, the analytics we create give new insights and GDA has adopted the following internal regulations to ensure that the impact on the sport is only positive. These regulations are implemented by account and database security software.
1) Any individual, with an appropriate GDA account, can access all of the data pertaining directly to them. eg. Riders can access their full results, judges can access details of events they have judged, etc.
2) Final results for any rider at an International level can be accessed by any GDA account holder, including the different final scores awarded by each judge when these have been published by the event organizer
3) Final results for National tests are visible to the general public only if they are similarly available within that Nation.
4) Figure by Figure scores are publicly visible for Championships as defined by the FEI or when made publicly available by the Event Organizer or National Federation.
5) Detailed Figure trend and similar analytics are only visible to the Rider involved and to their National Federation and to the appointed representatives of that NF (e.g. National Trainers)
1) Except that, a Rider can elect to share their results with Private Trainers and Horse Owners or other individuals, in which case the detailed analysis is available also to those individuals. A Rider can at any time withdraw that access right from these people.
2) A rider can elect to make their detailed results for a specific, or for all, horses publicly visible
6) Jury members and event organizers have access to the judging analysis of events they have judged/organized, but not to the judging analysis of other events.
7) Judging consistency, trends and such analytics are only visible to the judge concerned and to the relevant federation (NF or FEI)
8) Rider and Judges with the relevant subscriptions can compare themselves with peer groups selected according to specific criteria. However, these criteria cannot be constrained to limit the peer-group to less than 10 other persons. Only averaged results of such peer-groups can be compared with the individuals personal results.